Repository logo
 

Sustainability Reporting (SR) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) : a corporate governance and ownership structure perspective

dc.contributor.advisorHoeyi, Prosper Kweku
dc.contributor.advisorBadu, Ebenezer Agyemang
dc.contributor.authorBlay, Marshall Wellingtonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-30T18:38:24Z
dc.date.available2025-03-30T18:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management Sciences Specialising in Business Administration at the Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2024.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe level of sustainability reporting (SR) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is still low and unsatisfactory. Nonetheless, studies on corporate governance and SR in SSA are limited. The immaturity of the capital markets of the SSA limits the acquisition of valid and reliable sustainability data. Most studies on corporate governance and SR are therefore, largely within the context of businesses in the developed world with matured capital markets. There is also evidence of limited emphasis on the boundary condition of ownership structure in the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability reporting. The aim of this study was to investigate the moderating role of ownership structure in the extent to which the corporate governance practices of businesses in SSA promote SR. The study focused on SSA's publicly listed non-financial firms as of 31 December 2021. STATA 14.1 and GMM were used to analyze secondary data. The Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data estimation method was applied to a balanced panel of 1,969 observations from 275 groups spanning 2012 to 2021. The study revealed ownership structure notably shaped corporate governance's effect on sustainability disclosure in SSA listed businesses. In addition it was found that government ownership bolstered board independence's environmental sustainability reporting (ESR) impact, while foreign ownership weakened Board female gender diversity (BFGD) influence. Board independence enhanced social sustainability reporting (SSR), but government ownership weakened audit committee attributes' SSR link. Foreign ownership amplified the connection between audit committee size and SSR, but weakened it for sustainability committee independence. BFGD, board independence, independent remuneration, and sustainability committees positively correlated with ESR. Conversely, larger remuneration committees and more sustainability meetings negatively related to reduced ESR. It is therefore imperative for SSA firms to establish standard CSR/ESG boards for functional effectiveness. In a nutshell, the influence of corporate governance on reporting is moderated by ownership structure, highlighting the importance of tailored ownership arrangements to enhance sustainability reporting. Policies should prioritize environmental and social reporting, as it receives less emphasis compared to traditional financial reporting.en_US
dc.description.levelDen_US
dc.format.extent365 pen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/5871
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/5871
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen_US
dc.subjectOwnership structureen_US
dc.subjectSustainability reportingen_US
dc.subject.lcshSustainable development reporting--Africa, Sub-Saharanen_US
dc.subject.lcshSocial responsibility of business--Africa, Sub-Saharanen_US
dc.subject.lcshCorporate governance--Africa, Sub-Saharanen_US
dc.titleSustainability Reporting (SR) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) : a corporate governance and ownership structure perspectiveen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
local.sdgSDG11en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Blay_MW_2024.pdf
Size:
3.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: