Academic training evaluation of building technology programme

Abstract

Training evaluation is one method through which tertiary institutions examine the effectiveness of the training they deliver in order to establish their students' readiness for the workplace. However, several higher institutions' evaluation methods have been confined to assessment in tests and exams without considering the knowledge and competencies acquired by students via training in fulfilling workplace expectations. Hence, the study assessed the training received by Building technology graduates in construction management and construction technology courses. The study adopted the Kirkpatrick model's first two stages of training evaluation (Reaction and Learning levels) with a questionnaire distributed to purposively selected Building technology graduates from two polytechnics in Southwestern Nigeria using a snowball sampling technique. Data obtained were analysed using descriptive statistical tools. The study's findings show that respondents were satisfied with the training acquired and possess the basic competency from the training. However, the graduates lack sufficient knowledge of laws and regulations governing construction work, the use of computer programme for planning and scheduling projects and the ability to use tools and equipment for construction work. The study findings imply that building graduates would be unable to work adequately in the construction industry without additional training, putting enormous strain on construction firms to re-training them to meet their expectations. Tertiary institutions need to revamp their training strategies and methods for students to improve their competency to strive in the construction industry.