Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2088
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorProsser, Julia Judith-
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Janet Elizabethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T06:48:40Z
dc.date.available2017-01-31T06:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.otherDIT94027-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2088-
dc.descriptionA dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Education, Technikon Natal, Durban, South Africa, 2000.en_US
dc.description.abstractA random sample of learners and educators, at a Technikon, was surveyed with regard to the teaching behaviours that most contributed to effective learning. Variables included in the survey were identified by a focus group of educators and learners who negotiated the content of the survey questionnaire over a six-week period. This methodology ensured that learners were able to voice their interests in what should be assessed in a summative learner evaluation of teaching. Educator opinion on what feedback they would be prepared to receive from learners was a necessary touchstone to ensure compliance with legislative and administrative requirements for good practice in performance appraisal. Educators and learners agreed on thirteen of fourteen significant educator behaviours which learners felt contributed to effective learning. These findings suggest that a) learners and educators may not be as dissimilar in their teaching and learning agendas as previously thought and b) that participant meanings regarding teaching and learning practice may playa large role in defining teaching competence. Supervisor: MRS J. PROSSER Department of Educationen_US
dc.format.extent122 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Higheren_US
dc.subject.lcshTeachingen_US
dc.subject.lcshCollege teachersen_US
dc.subject.lcshTeachers--Rating ofen_US
dc.titleStudent evaluations of teaching as a tool for making summative personnel decisions at a tertiary institutionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2088-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
HARRISON_2000.pdf5.79 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

628
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Download(s)

215
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.