Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4324
Title: A case study : evaluation of adjudication as a dispute resolution method : NEC and FIDIC contracts
Authors: Mkhize, Zizodwa Zizo 
Keywords: Adjudication;Dispute resolution method;NEC;FIDIC
Issue Date: 29-Sep-2022
Abstract: 
Construction development plays an important role in the development of South Africa,
not only in respect of its built infrastructure, but also in its broader economic and social
development. It also creates employment prospects on a broader scale. Construction
contract adjudication has been introduced in South Africa by means of four forms of
contracts endorsed by the Construction Industry Development Board. Amusan and
Owolabi (2014) mention that the unfavourable outcomes of project objectives in terms
of time, cost and quality are as a result of delays in construction projects. Although
disputes may be unwanted, having suitable knowledge to manage disputes when they
happen often provides better results for the disputants and the project. The study was
conducted in an electricity generation organisation, which has various divisions and
departments that develop and execute projects. Complex projects that require multiple
interdivisional or external stakeholder interfaces are planned, developed and
implemented in the Group Capital Division (GCD). The purpose of this research study
was to evaluate whether the causes, practices and outcomes of the construction
contract adjudication method for the Fédération Internationale des IngénieursConseils (FIDIC) were similar to those of New Engineering Contract (NEC) used for
infrastructure construction projects. A mixed method by means of a case study was
adopted to answer the research questions. Data were collected from an analysis of 33
study documents related to FIDIC and NEC contract case studies. The results of the
study showed the following: 1) There are comparable causes of disputes among the
two contracts, even though they vary in terms of ranking on each contract; 2) some of
the disputes referred to adjudication could have been avoided; and 3) FIDIC and NEC
complied with the adjudication practice, and the outcomes of the adjudications differed
based on the merits of each case.
Description: 
Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements of the degree of Master of Engineering: Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Durban University of Technology, 2021.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4324
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4324
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Engineering and Built Environment)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Mkhize_ZZ_2021.pdfThesis2.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

189
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

1,667
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.