Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3941
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMugari, Alpha-
dc.contributor.authorMakhanya, Philasande Dedictusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T18:00:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-28T18:00:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/3941-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Management Sciences Specialising in Public Administration and Management in the Faculty of Management Sciences at the Durban University of Technology, 2021.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of the implementation of the progression of education policy at public institutions. It sought to explore the factors that qualify a student for advancement, examine the behaviour and academic performance of progressed students in a classroom and seek ways of resolving the unintended consequences the policy has caused within the schooling system. A qualitative interpretive paradigm was adopted. Data was collected using semi structured interview questionnaires administered to teachers and learners from conveniently selected four schools in the Pinetown District Department of Education from a sample of 80 participants. The outcomes of this systematic inquiry have revealed massive and complex effects of the implementation of the progression of education policy. Concerning learners, these include the inability to cope with the next level, future poor performance and capabilities, lack of interest in learning, students’ reliance and entitlement. Regarding teachers, these include teacher frustration, delusion and false confidence, poor performance in Grade 12, and lack of key attributes amongst many others. As recommendations to the implementation challenges of the PPP and future educational policy matter, bottom-up consultation, monitoring and evaluation, and alternative ways of pedagogy were seen as integral strategies to remedy the implementation thereof. Whilst a plethora of interventions and recommendations were made, immediate interventions include extra classes, practical and technical skills, experimental work, repetitive teaching, knowledge and understanding, reducing over-crowded classes, identification of learner difficulties at an early stage, and parental involvement featured prominentlyen_US
dc.format.extent188 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectProgression Education Policyen_US
dc.subjectPublic institutionsen_US
dc.subject.lcshPublic administration--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshProgressive education--Government policy--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshPublic schools--Government policy--South Africaen_US
dc.titleEffect of the implementation of the Progression Education Policy at public institutions : a case study of Pinetown district in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3941-
local.sdgSDG04-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Makhanya_PD_2021.pdfThesis3.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

557
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

1,077
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.