Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3869
Title: The effect of dry needling on trapezius muscle activity and post needling soreness in participants with latent trapezius myofascial trigger points
Authors: Peter, Steven J. 
Keywords: Dry-needling
Issue Date: 5-Sep-2019
Abstract: 
Background:
Dry needling (DN) is an established and effective modality which is used globally
for the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MFTPs). Post-needling soreness
(PNS) is a common side effect which is felt shortly after DN at the site of needle
insertion and peaks at 24 hours post-treatment. Research of its effects on muscle
activity, range of motion, numerical pain rating scale and pain pressure threshold
exist but focuses on pre- and post-needling measurements and a follow up
measurement at 24 hours. This study objectively tried to investigate the effects of
DN in the first few hours after treatment, in terms of pain pressure threshold (PPT),
range of motion (ROM), surface electromyography (sEMG), and post needling
soreness.
Objectives
To determine the effect of dry needling latent myofascial trigger points (LMFTPs)
in the upper trapezius muscle with respect to: numerical pain rating scale (NRS),
PPT, ROM and sEMG in the first four hours after treatment.
Methodology
This was a quantitative pre-test post-test design study with repeated follow up
measurements. Through a purposive convenient sampling strategy, 15
asymptomatic volunteers were recruited into the study.
Baseline readings were taken for the NRS, sEMG, PPT and ROM readings were
then taken.
After baseline readings were taken, the LMFTP was dry needled, and the
measurements were taken again in the same order. The measurements were
taken every hour for four hours post needling. IBM SPSS version 25 was used to analyse the data. A p value <0.05 was
considered as statistically significant. Comparison of measurements over time
were achieved using non-parametric Friedman tests for paired data. Post hoc tests
were done in the case of a significant Friedman’s test in order to determine which
pairs of measurements differed. Correlations between the changes over time of
each measurement were done using non-parametric Spearman’s correlation.
Results
For the NRS there was a statistically significant increase in perceived pain at the
first measurement post treatment (p < 0.001). While there was no significant
difference in algometer measurements over time (p = 0.321). CROM showed an
improvement in all tested movements: ipsilateral PA rotation (p < 0.001),
contralateral PA rotation (p < 0.001), ipsilateral lateral flexion (p = 0.001) and
contralateral lateral flexion (p < 0.001). With regards to sEMG root mean square
(RMS) There was no difference between the time points (p = 0. 534).
The following correlations were noted:
Changes in contralateral and ipsilateral PA rotation were strongly positively
correlated together (rho = 0.711).
Changes in ipsilateral PA rotation was negatively correlated with change in 1-
minute rest (rho = -0.569).
Changes in contralateral PA rotation was positively correlated with change in mean
contraction (rho = 0.527).
Conclusions
In conclusion, the results of this study show that DN of LMFTPs in the upper
trapezius muscle may be effective at improving CROM without eliciting a strong PNS
effect or a significant drop in PPT. As this is one of the few studies that exist to test
objective and subjective results in the first four hours after needling, it is difficult to
draw strong conclusions.
Description: 
A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences in partial compliance with the requirements for the Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, at the Durban University of Technology, 2019.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3869
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3869
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Peter_S_2019.pdfthesis1.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

275
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

150
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.