Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2511
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKaye, Sylvia-
dc.contributor.advisorHarris, Geoffrey Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorMakwerere, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T10:22:16Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-31T10:22:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.other683351-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2511-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy: Management Sciences (Peace Studies), Duban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2017.en_US
dc.description.abstractLocal peacebuilding practices require a systematic and reflective analysis in order for them to bring an impact. Successful peacebuilding pivots on the development of a set of skills to attend to the challenges presented by the conflict. The study was inspired by an observation that the emergence of CSOs working on peacebuilding in Zimbabwe was happening in a context where there was no proper training and organisational capacity development. Using an action-research design, and a case study of two CSOs operating in Bindura and Mazowe Districts in Mashonaland Central Province in Zimbabwe, the study involved a sample group of fifty-seven participants, and included a core Action Research Team (ART) of twelve participants to initiate the process of capacity development related to peacebuilding in Zimbabwe. Interviews, Focus Group Discussions, Document studies were used in a triangulation approach to enhance validity and reliability of the process. The preliminary assessment revealed that the peacebuilding environment in the two districts is highly polarised. There is a combination of both direct and indirect violence in the area. The state as well as traditional institutions are active perpetrators of both direct and indirect violence in the two district. The use of Local Peace Committees and the workshop method has not reaped the desired outcomes owing to the polarization. After a preliminary assessment of the peacebuilding environment in the area as well as a critique of the peacebuilding models being used by the two organisations, we then set out on a process of identifying strengths and weaknesses in both the programming as well as the delivery of the projects in the communities. A series of focus group discussions and organisational document analysis of the two organisations, we eventually agreed on the development of a training module for the Action Research Team. Five thematic issues were identified as forming the basis of the intervention programme. The five thematic issues were on the conceptual issues of conflict, violence and peace in a local context, conflict analysis skills, conflict sensitive programming, culture, conflict and change and lastly basic counselling skills for peacebuilders. A three-day training workshop was then held in order to develop capacity relating to the thematic issues. The short term evaluation of the intervention showed that the training was successful as the participants had already started implementing some of the new knowledge and skills.en_US
dc.format.extent318 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPeacebuildingen_US
dc.subjectSkillsen_US
dc.subjectLocal contexten_US
dc.subjectSensitivityen_US
dc.subjectCultureen_US
dc.subjectCapacity developmenten_US
dc.subject.lcshPeace-building--Zimbabween_US
dc.subject.lcshCivil society--Zimbabween_US
dc.subject.lcshConflict management--Zimbabween_US
dc.subject.lcshNon-governmental organizations--Zimbabween_US
dc.subject.lcshNonprofit organizations--Zimbabween_US
dc.titleDeveloping peacebuilding skills among civil society organisations in Zimbabween_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelDen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2511-
local.sdgSDG16-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
MAKWERERED_2017.pdf4.87 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,024
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 20

4,992
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.