Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2086
Title: A comparative analysis of the 3-field radiation treatment technique versus the 4-field radiation treatment technique in the treatment of patients presenting with either stage B or stage C prostate cancer
Authors: Moodley, Loganee
Issue Date: 2001
Abstract: 
Radical radiotherapy is quite commonly used to treat localised prostate cancer. Acute and chronic toxicity to the bladder and rectum are dependant upon field arrangement, dose delivered to these organs and the volume of these organs that is within the target volume. A prospective study was conducted in order to determine whether the 3-field or the 4-field radiation treatment technique yields less severe bladder and rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixty patients with histologically confirmed stage B or C (Jewitt's staging system) prostate cancer, with or without radical prostatectomy were recruited from two private oncology institutions, 30 of whom were in group 1 (3-field technique) and 30 in group 2 (4-field technique). Pre-treatment and post-treatment prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels were recorded in order to compare the effect of radiation on PSA. Both groups were treated in 2.00gy fractions per day to a dose of 60.00gy before the field arrangements were changed. This study therefore assessed the patients
Description: 
Dissertation submitted in full compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Radiography, Natal Technikon, Durban, South Africa, 2001.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2086
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2086
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Moodley_2001.pdf7.37 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

450
checked on Jul 16, 2024

Download(s)

300
checked on Jul 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.