Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKretzmann, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorHicklin, John Renshaw
dc.descriptionDissertation in partial compliance with requirements for the Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was establish if Leander versus Static traction was useful for the treatment of facet syndrome, a common type of mechanical lower back pain seen by chiropractors. Two groups of fifteen participants were chosen on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The first objective was to determine if Static linear traction was effective for the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome in terms of subjective and objective findings. The second objective was to determine if Leander traction was effective for the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome in terms of subjective and objective clinical findings. Lastly the third objective was to compare the subjective and objective clinical findings for both groups. Design: A randomised, two group parallel controlled clinical trial was carried out between the two sample groups. Participants had to have had chronic lower back pain (> 3months). Thirty symptomatic volunteer participants between 25 and 55 were randomly divided into two equal groups – group A (Leander traction) received 5 treatments over a 2 week period. Similarly, group B (Static linear traction) also received 5 treatments over a 2 week period. Algometer readings, Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS101), Pain Severity Scale (PSS) and Oswestery Disabilty Index (ODI) were used as v assessment tools. Subjective and objective clinical findings were taken on the first and second visits (i.e. 48 hours) prior to treatment and immediately after treatment. Another set of subjective and objective readings were taken one week after the fifth treatment in order to gauge the long term effects of both treatments. No treatment was given on the sixth visit. Pressure tolerance measurements using an algometer were taken at the end ranges of motion in Kemp’s test and spinal extension. Outcome measures: SPSS version 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analysis of data. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The two groups were compared at baseline in terms of demographics variables and location using Pearson’s chi square tests and ttests as appropriate. Intra-group comparisons were made between all time points. A significant time effect indicated successful treatment intervention. Inter-group comparisons were achieved using repeated measures ANOVA tests for each outcome measured separately. A significant time group interaction effect indicated a significant treatment effect. Profile plots were used to assess the trend and direction of the treatment effect. Results: The results of the study showed that Leander traction and Static linear traction were both effective for treating chronic lumbar facet syndrome and no statistically significant difference was found between subjective and objective clinical findings between the two groups.en_US
dc.format.extent211 pen_US
dc.subject.lcshBackache--Chiropractic treatmenten_US
dc.subject.lcshLumbar vertebrae--Diseasesen_US
dc.subject.lcshOrthopedic tractionen_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of Leander traction versus Static linear traction on chronic facet syndrome patients : a randomised clinical trialen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hicklin_2010.pdf2.56 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

checked on Jun 18, 2019

Download(s) 50

checked on Jun 18, 2019

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.