Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/5216
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSeymour-Walsh, Amy-
dc.contributor.advisorMtshali, Philile-
dc.contributor.authorMtetwa, Malusien_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-26T12:12:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-26T12:12:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/5216-
dc.descriptionA dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Health Sciences in Emergency Medical Care at the Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2022.en_US
dc.description.abstractWork-related stress is generally defined as harmful physical or emotional responses that may occur when the needs of the occupation do not match the abilities, resources or necessities of the employee. This can lead to poor health and physical injury. Emergency medical care personnel (EMCP) are not immune to this condition. They are a vital component of the healthcare system but workplace stress places their effectiveness at risk. This is evident when they have to treat patients at scenes of a violent nature. Such experiences result in an increase in stress thereby affecting their decision-making abilities. As employees have a right to be safe at work, they must be able to access the tools required to ensure they remain emotionally safe and well. This study aimed to identify the tools currently supporting EMCP in the Emergency Medical Care Service of the Gauteng Provincial Government (GPG) in Johannesburg, South Africa, and whether these tools are currently utilised. It also sought to investigate how effective these tools are in reducing work-related stress among EMCP. Qualitative methods were used to investigate the meaning of social phenomena around the tools used to manage work-related stress, as encountered by EMCP in their work capacity. The study followed an interpretivism philosophy, using purposeful sampling, while data collection was conducted using in-depth interviews. The population comprised EMCP working in Johannesburg for the GPG, and participants were selected using non-probability sampling, following a snowball technique. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The research found that tools to manage work-related stress (WRS) were available and were utilised. However, some causes of WRS were found not to have adequate tools for reducing such stress. While some tools had positive effects, like formal debriefing sessions, others like the Employee Wellness Programme (EWP) needed some improvement. Additionally, the lack of security increased WRS immensely, yet there were very limited effective tools designed to reduce stress from the increased security threats experienced by EMCP. Finally, causes of WRS were identified for which no tools were available for its reduction and thus immediate action is required to reduce it. WRS has been seen to have multiple adverse effects for organisations in general and EMCP in particular. Therefore, addressing issues raised by this research could have a positive impact on the industry. In addition, the findings contribute to the body of knowledge on mental health among prehospital emergency care workers.en_US
dc.format.extent137 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectWorkplace stressen_US
dc.subjectPersonnelen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Careen_US
dc.subject.lcshEmergency medical personnel--Job stress--South Africa--Johannesburgen_US
dc.subject.lcshJob stress--Treatmenten_US
dc.titleThe use and effectiveness of the tools designed to reduce emergency medical care personnel workplace stress : a critical analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/5216-
local.sdgSDG03en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Mtetwa_M_2022.pdf3.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

193
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Download(s)

236
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.