Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4899
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAroba, Oluwasegun Juliusen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaicker, Nalindrenen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdeliyi, Timothy T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOgunsakin, Ropo E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T06:28:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-21T06:28:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.citationAroba, O.J. et al. 2020. Meta analysis of heuristic approaches for optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 10(1): 81-88. doi:10.35940/ijeat.a1717.1010120en_US
dc.identifier.issn2249-8958 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4899-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the literature node localization and energy efficiency are intrinsic problems often experienced in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Consequently, various heuristic approaches have been proposed to allay the challenges faced by WSNs. However, there is little to nothing in the literature to support which of the heuristic approaches is best in optimizing node localization and energy efficiency problems in WSN. The aim of this paper is to assess the best heuristic approach to date on resolving the node localization and energy efficiency in WSNs. Method: The extraction of the relevant articles was designed following the technique of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). All the included research articles were searched from the widely used databases of Google Scholar and Web of Science. All statistical analysis was performed with the fixed-effects model and the random-effects model implementation in RStudio. The overall pooled global estimate and categorization of performance for the heuristic approaches were presented in forest plots. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis and the overall pooled estimated categorization of the heuristic approaches was 35% (95% CI (13%, 67%)). According to subgroup analysis the pooled estimation of heuristic approach with hyper-heuristic was 71% (95% CI: 6% to 99%), I2 = 100%) while the hybrid heuristic, was 31% (95% CI: 3% to 87%, I2 = 100%) and metaheuristic was 21%(95% CI: 9% to 41%, I2 = 100%). Conclusion: It can be concluded based on the experimental results that hyper-heuristic approach outclassed the hybrid heuristic and metaheuristic approaches in optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in WSNs.</jats:p>en_US
dc.format.extent8 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESPen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology; Vol. 10, Issue 1en_US
dc.subjectHyper-Heuristicen_US
dc.subjectHybrid Heuristicen_US
dc.subjectMetaheuristicen_US
dc.subjectNode localizationen_US
dc.subjectWireless sensor networken_US
dc.titleMeta analysis of heuristic approaches for optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2023-06-30T10:00:44Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.35940/ijeat.a1717.1010120-
local.sdgSDG14-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Accounting and Informatics)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
IJEAT Copyright Clearance.docxCopyright clearance197.28 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
OJAroba et al_2020.pdfArticle516 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

194
checked on Sep 13, 2024

Download(s)

52
checked on Sep 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.