Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4425
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoyo, Ranganai Tawandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTabakov, Pavel Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoyo, Sibusisoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T07:26:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-20T07:26:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationMoyo, R.T.; Moyo, S. and Tabakov, P.Y. 2022. Comparative analysis of different computational intelligence techniques for maximum power point tracking of PV systems. Journal of Sustainable Energy. 13(1): 12-22 (10). doi:10.5281/zenodo.7139169en_US
dc.identifier.issn2067-5534-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4425-
dc.description.abstractThe performance of a photovoltaic (PV) module can be improved by employing maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controllers. MPPT controllers are algorithms that are included in PV battery charge controllers or inverters to extract the maximum available power from PV modules for any given temperature and irradiance. Several studies report that the use of PV modules without MPPT controllers results in power losses, which ultimately results in the need to install more solar panels for the same power requirement. Numerous techniques of varying complexities have been proposed in the literature to solve the MPPT objective function. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three computational intelligence (CI) based MPPT techniques namely, the fuzzy logic (FL) based controller, artificial neural networks (ANN) based controller, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) based controller and one conventional technique, the perturbation and observation (P&O) controller. These MPPT controllers are designed, simulated and analysed in the MATLAB/Simulink environment. The performance of the studied MPPT techniques is evaluated under steady-state weather conditions, rapidly changing weather conditions and varying load conditions. CI-based MPPT controllers are found to be more efficient than the P&O controller. Moreover, the ANFIS-based MPPT controller shows an outstanding MPPT performance for all the scenarios studied.en_US
dc.format.extent10 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oradeaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sustainable Energy; Vol. 13, Issue 1en_US
dc.subjectMaximum power point trackingen_US
dc.subjectComputational intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectPhotovoltaicen_US
dc.subjectAdaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systemen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of different computational intelligence techniques for maximum power point tracking of PV systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2022-10-11T13:20:35Z-
dc.publisher.urihttps://energy-cie.ro/en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-6-1-
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.7139169-
local.sdgSDG07-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Engineering and Built Environment)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
MoyoTabakovMoyo_2022.pdfArticle1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
JSE Copyright Clearance.docxCopyright Clearance212.27 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

300
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

103
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.