Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3705
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorOlarewaju, Odunayo Magret-
dc.contributor.advisorCloete, Melanie Bernice-
dc.contributor.authorOyewo,Toyese Titusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T08:40:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-26T08:40:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/3705-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Master of Accounting Degree in Management Accounting, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2020.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe availability of energy (electricity) is a key factor in economic growth and the sustainability of production processes. The need to quantitatively measure the environmental risk and hazard associated with energy sources for the environment is useful in evaluating capital investment for decision-making. Coal (fossil fuel) is the main source of energy in South Africa, based on its availability and cost-effectiveness. Specifically, quantitative research using mathematical marginal social cost modelling to evaluate the environmental cost of emissions emanating from the Electricity Supply Commission’s (ESKOM) coal power stations is employed. It was discovered that the price of electricity has trebled over the lifespan of coal power plants. Therefore, the need to construct coal power plants with optimum levels of production was highlighted. The net present value (NPV) technique was used to evaluate ESKOM's capital investment and the marginal social cost mathematical model was developed for measuring and quantifying the emission costs associated with the lifespan of the coal power plants. Results revealed that the optimum level production of 2,150,000 Gigawatts per annum within the range of the present capacity of ESKOM of 2,292,000 gigawatts annually is required and profitable to ESKOM. The net present value yielded a positive value of R1, 448,713,000,000-00 over a period of 30 years of coal power plants’ life-span. However, various technologies used to minimize emissions were also considered and investigated to confirm the feasibility and profitability of investment in coal- powered stations using environmental management accounting and marginal social cost approaches.en_US
dc.format.extent91 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCoal (fossil fuel)en_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectESKOMen_US
dc.subject.lcshEnvironmental impact analysisen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectric power systems--Environmental aspectsen_US
dc.subject.lcshRenewable energyen_US
dc.subject.lcshEnvironmental economicsen_US
dc.subject.lcshFossil fuelsen_US
dc.titleAssessing the impact of environmental cost on the capital investment decision-making of the Electricity Supply Commission, South Africaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3705-
local.sdgSDG07-
local.sdgSDG08-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Accounting and Informatics)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
OyewoT_2020.pdf3.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

455
checked on Oct 30, 2024

Download(s)

253
checked on Oct 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.