Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2986
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaupt, Theo C.-
dc.contributor.authorHefer, Elke-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-28T06:38:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-28T06:38:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationHaupt, T.C. and Hefer, E. 2016. Adapt or Die! Building Information Modelling (BIM). The Tenth Built Environment Conference 31 July - 2 August 2016, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. :1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978 - 0 - 620 - 71904 - 9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2986-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The emergence of Building Information Modelling (BIM) demands that quantity surveyors review their roles in the construction sector. This study examines the responsiveness of the quantity surveying discipline to BIM. Design/methodology/approach: A sample of quantity surveyors in Durban will be surveyed using an instrument developed from published literature on responses of quantity surveying to BIM. Research limitations: The sample of quantity surveyors was drawn from the Durban area using the Association of South African Quantity Surveyors (ASAQS) and South African Council for the Quantity Surveying Professions (SACQSP) database. Findings: Preliminary findings suggest that quantity surveyors’ knowledge about BIM, software and innovation was at best rather average. They recognized the most obvious benefits of embracing BIM such as the time taken to produce Bills of Quantities and accurate cost estimation. Largely because of their lack of knowledge of available technologies they could not comment assertively on many of the issues surrounding the relationship between BIM and quantity surveying. This further resonates with the uncertainty that exists surrounding BIM and its business value and return on investment. They disagreed that technological advancements presented threats to their existence or the services that they traditionally offered. In the main the findings of the study resonated with those of other studies done particular in developing countries. Response to conference theme: This study identifies the reasons why BIM is not being readily embraced by quantity surveyors more pervasively. Practical implications: The findings provide the opportunity to improve the services currently offered by quantity surveyors but also new and innovative services driven by BIMen_US
dc.format.extent12 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation of Schools of Construction of Southern Africaen_US
dc.subjectQuantity surveyingen_US
dc.subjectBIMen_US
dc.subjectComputer hardwareen_US
dc.subjectComputer Softwareen_US
dc.titleAdapt or Die! Building Information Modelling (BIM)en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.asocsa.org/documents/proceedings/2016-ASOCSA-10th-BE-Conference-PortElizabeth.pdfen_US
dc.dut-rims.pubnumDUT-005821en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypePresentation-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Engineering and Built Environment)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Haupt_ASOCSA_12Pgs_2016.pdf977.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

924
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Download(s)

399
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.