Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2848
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Myburgh, Cornelius | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tucker, Mark L. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-15T08:17:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-15T08:17:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.other | DIT93947 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 117765 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2848 | - |
dc.description | A dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, Durban, South Africa, 2001. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative effectiveness of manipulation versus meloxicam (a Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug) to determine which is more beneficial in treating osteoarthritis of the knee. This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial consisting of a population of sixty voluntary subjects, diagnosed as suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee. The patients were divided equally into two groups of thirty, with Group A receiving chiropractic manipulative therapy on eight consultations over three weeks, and Group B receiving meloxicam 7,5mg tablets once daily for three weeks. Capturing of the subjective and objective data for both groups took place on the first, fourth and eighth consultations. Subjective data was captured using the Numerical Pain Rating scale-l 01, the Visual Analogue scale, as well as the Patient -Specific functional scale. Objective data was gathered from goniometric and pressure algometer measurements. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 172 p | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Arthritis | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Anti-inflammatory agents | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Chiropractic | en_US |
dc.title | The relative effectiveness of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication (meloxicam) versus manipulation in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.level | M | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2848 | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Thesis | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
Appears in Collections: | Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TUCKER_2001.pdf | 14.8 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
444
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Download(s)
402
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.