<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T20:32:38Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/939" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/939</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-07T22:45:24Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_11</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_12</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The relative effectiveness of Kinesio® taping methods as an adjunct to a single sacroiliac joint manipulation in the treatment of chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>De Beer, Quintin Hardus</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Jones, Andrew D.</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Chiropractic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Sacroiliac joint--Diseases--Chiropractic treatment</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Bandages and bandaging</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Manipulation (Therapeutics)</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s&#xd;
Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2013.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>The lifetime incidence of low back pain is between 48% to 79% in South Africa.&#xd;
Globally, chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome occurs in 13% to 63% of the world’s&#xd;
population. Therefore, chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome is a significant health&#xd;
problem that has the potential to have a major impact on quality of life.&#xd;
Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome is described as an alteration in normal motion or&#xd;
mechanics. The Sacroiliac Joint fibrous capsule contributes to proprioceptive and&#xd;
nociceptive output, which may be exacerbated when the joint is in a dysfunctional&#xd;
state.&#xd;
Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome may be effectively treated by spinal manipulative&#xd;
therapy. Spinal manipulative therapy is professed to have four therapeutic effects –&#xd;
mechanical correction, pain reducing effects, circulatory increase and neurobiologic&#xd;
effects. Similarly, Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy is professed to have comparable&#xd;
therapeutic effects – circulatory increase, pain reduction and stimulation of&#xd;
proprioceptive systems.&#xd;
Spinal manipulative therapy and Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy may, therefore, have&#xd;
similar therapeutic effects which, if used in adjunction, may produce enhanced&#xd;
therapeutic effects and accelerated results regarding reduction of symptoms in&#xd;
patients with chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome.&#xd;
This investigation aimed to determine whether Kinesio ® Taping methods would have&#xd;
any relative effect on the Sacroiliac Joint, and whether it would be appropriate to use&#xd;
as an adjunct to spinal manipulative therapy in the treatment of chronic Sacroiliac&#xd;
Joint Syndrome.&#xd;
The study was a prospective stratified clinical trial with three intervention groups,&#xd;
twenty participants in each (n = 60). All participants were 18-50 years of age and&#xd;
suffering from chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome. Subjective measurements included&#xd;
the Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. Objective&#xd;
measurements included the Algometer Scores. Numerical Rating Scale and&#xd;
Algometer measurements were taken before and immediately after treatment at the&#xd;
first consultation and at the second consultation. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability&#xd;
Index measurements were taken at the first and second consultation. Group One&#xd;
underwent spinal manipulative therapy alone, Group Two underwent Kinesio Tex®&#xd;
Tape therapy alone and Group Three underwent both spinal manipulative therapy&#xd;
and Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy in combination.&#xd;
Comparisons were made using the Unpaired and Paired t-tests. The results for the&#xd;
Inter-group analyses suggested that most comparisons were statistically insignificant&#xd;
(p ≥ 0.05) which indicated that all treatment groups appeared to improve to a similar&#xd;
degree. The results for the Intra-group analyses suggested that most comparisons&#xd;
were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05) which indicated that Kinesio Tex® Tape&#xd;
therapy was effective as an adjunct to spinal manipulative therapy, however not&#xd;
statistically more or less effective that spinal manipulative therapy or Kinesio Tex®&#xd;
Tape therapy alone.&#xd;
In conclusion, it was found that some differences did occur, however these&#xd;
differences were not sufficient enough to conclude that one treatment was more&#xd;
effective than the other.&#xd;
Further research with a larger sample size, more frequent treatments and follow-ups,&#xd;
a more homogenous stratification of age, ethnic group, gender, side of diagnosis and&#xd;
categorizing participant occupation is needed in order for the power of the study to&#xd;
be amplified and, therefore, any results would carry more weight.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>M</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2013-11-13T08:15:17Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2013-11-13T08:15:17Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2013-11-13</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>457507</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10321/939</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/939</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>177 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>