<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T12:36:37Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/672" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/672</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-07T22:45:25Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_11</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_12</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The clinical responsiveness of motion palpation as a post-manipulation diagnostic tool in patients with chronic ankle instability syndrome</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Belling, Kym Ashley</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Lakhani, Ekta</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Chiropractic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Ankle--Wounds and injuries--Chiropractic treatment</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Palpation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Manipulation (Therapeutics)</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Masters&#xd;
Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2011.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Introduction: Motion palpation is a commonly utilised clinical assessment tool of joint fixations.&#xd;
Most research surrounding motion palpation discusses inter and/or intra-examiner reliability as a&#xd;
pre-treatment tool. However, only two studies have assessed the reliability of motion palpation&#xd;
as a post-treatment diagnostic tool, and both these studies demonstrated that motion palpation&#xd;
has the ability to identify end-feel improvement in a restricted segment which had been&#xd;
manipulated. Therefore the use of motion palpation as a post-manipulation tool within the spine&#xd;
showed a relatively high level of responsiveness/efficacy of motion palpation. However little&#xd;
research has yet to be conducted on the use of motion palpation as a post-manipulation tool on&#xd;
the extremities and therefore this study aims to provide a clearer insight into the use of motion&#xd;
palpation as a post-treatment assessment tool in an extremity in terms of clinical&#xd;
responsiveness/validity of motion palpation. Furthermore the relationship between motion&#xd;
palpation and other clinical measures/short term outcomes, such as pain, functionality, range of&#xd;
motion and proprioception has yet to be seen i.e. when motion palpation indicates a reduction in&#xd;
a fixation due to manipulation does this correlate to a decrease in pain and increase in&#xd;
functionality, range of motion and proprioception. Therefore the primary aim of this study was to&#xd;
determine the clinical responsiveness of motion palpation as a post-manipulation diagnostic tool&#xd;
within the joints of the ankle in symptomatic participants with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI).&#xd;
Method: Forty participants with CAI (Grade I and II) were recruited. One Group received&#xd;
manipulation (n=21), the other Group received no treatment (n=19). Motion palpation was&#xd;
performed, and subjective/objective measures were taken in both Groups pre- and posttreatment.&#xd;
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0.&#xd;
Results: The findings of this study demonstrated that when using motion palpation as a posttreatment&#xd;
assessment tool a high level of responsiveness was observed (a highly significant&#xd;
association between being manipulated and End-Feel Improvement (EFI) occurred (p&lt;0.001));&#xd;
it was highly sensitive (0.90); and was highly specific (0.95).&#xd;
Overall no statistically significant association was observed in either group between, motion&#xd;
palpation results (with respect to EFI or no EFI noted) and any of the short term outcomes (the&#xd;
five subjective/objective clinical measures). Within the manipulation group; Visual Analogue&#xd;
Scale (VAS) (p=0.944), Functional Ankle Disability Index (FADI) (p=0.490), Pressure Algometer&#xd;
v&#xd;
(p=0.634), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (p=0.512) and Weight Bearing Dorsiflexion (WBD)&#xd;
(p=0.966). In comparison, the control group; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (p=0.063), Functional&#xd;
Ankle Disability Index (FADI) (p=0.491), Pressure Algometer (p=0.828), Berg Balance Scale&#xd;
(BBS) (p=0.695) and Weight Bearing Dorsiflexion (WBD) (p=0.747). The most common fixations&#xd;
noted in this study, were mortise Long Axis Distraction (LAD), subtalar LAD and subtalar&#xd;
eversion.&#xd;
Conclusion:&#xd;
Therefore, motion palpation appears to be valid when used as a post-treatment tool in the foot and ankle; and overall, common fixations found in symptomatic participants with CAI in this study are similar to those found in previous studies.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>M</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2012-02-13T12:02:22Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2013-09-01T22:20:12Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>407595</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10321/672</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/672</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>National sun</dc:relation>
   <dc:format>212 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>