<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T21:08:17Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/6248" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/6248</identifier><datestamp>2025-10-28T12:10:52Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_11</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_12</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Experiences of biomedical sciences students and staff in blended learning during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in a University of Technology, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Ntimbane, Nonkululeko Protasia</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Orton, Penelope Margaret</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Blended learning</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>COVID-19 pandemic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Blended Learning in universities</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Blended Learning in higher education</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Medical sciences</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Blended learning</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2023</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Universities and colleges--South Africa--KwaZulu-Natal--Employees--Attitudes</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>College students--South Africa--KwaZulu-Natal--Attitudes</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Medical Laboratory Medicine, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2025.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>This study explored and described the experiences of biomedical sciences students 
and staff who used blended teaching and learning during COVID-19 pandemic. To 
follow social distancing protocol, limited number of students and staff were permitted 
on campus at a time, while others were online to limit the spread of severe acute 
respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 virus). The objective of this study
was to determine and recommend the necessary resources and skills needed by 
biomedical sciences students and staff for blended learning at a historically 
disadvantaged university of technology and better prepare for future pandemics. The 
aim is to help the university stakeholders to budget, invest, and direct resources and 
skills for blended teaching and learning appropriately.
Purposeful sampling was used to select 14 participants from biomedical science 
population of 100 students and 14 staff (eight lecturers, 3 laboratory technicians, two 
laboratory assistants and one secretary). Purposeful sampling was chosen as it is 
characterized by the intentional selection of units pertinent to the study issue as it 
strategically focuses on traits within a population, enabling researchers to gather rich, 
contextual data. Qualitative descriptive content analysis research method was chosen 
to make replicable and valid inferences of the phenomenon from texts. Semi structured individual interviews were used to collect data and data was analyzed 
continuously using descriptive content analysis. Participants were interviewed until 
data reached data saturation. 
The results of this study showed that staff and students were unprepared for the 
emergency transformation. There were disparities in students’ device access and 
availability, students' digital skills; some had basic knowledge of computers, while 
others had none. Students and staff had challenges of poor internet connection due to 
load shedding and poor infrastructure, but students in rural areas had worse network 
connections than those in urban areas. Students and staff had to learn how to navigate 
iv
the learning management systems (LMSs) on the run, as most of them were unfamiliar 
with those systems.
Laboratory practical experiments took longer as students were divided into small 
groups to observe social distancing protocol of COVID-19 pandemic, students worked
individually rather than in pairs, and load shedding occasionally caused tests to be 
postponed. Online assessments compromised the quality of education, and some 
students cheated as staff could not monitor students online due to a lack of electronic proctoring tools. At times, students could not submit assignments and tests on time 
due to poor network connections or load shedding. Despite the challenges and 
unpleasant experience that students and staff faced during COVID-19 blended 
teaching and learning, blended learning achieved the learning objectives.
The report makes several recommendations for infrastructure support, including giving 
out laptops and/or data to students in need, upgrading lecture halls to smart 
classrooms, offering computer training on learning management systems and 
continuous support to students and staff, to increase proficiency and preparedness, 
and lastly designing a blended learning approach suitable for biomedical science</dc:description>
   <dc:description>M</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2025-10-27T10:12:27Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2025-10-27T10:12:27Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2024-12-02</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10321/6248</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/6248</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>158 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>