<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T21:50:38Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4750" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4750</identifier><datestamp>2025-04-03T01:04:46Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_13</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_14</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Grassroots transitional justice framework : the role of mediation in Zimbabwe’s transitional justice processes</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Mandikwaza, Edknowledge</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Kaye, Sylvia Blanche</dc:contributor>
   <dc:contributor>Harris, Geoffrey Thomas</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Grassroots transitional justice processes</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Mediation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Conflict management</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Transitional justice</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Social justice--Zimbabwe</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Justice, Administration of--Political aspects</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Mediation</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration – Peace Studies, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2022.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>This study investigated the role of mediation in grassroots transitional justice&#xd;
processes. The major aim of the study was to understand the role of mediation in&#xd;
transitional justice processes, ascertaining its effectiveness as a grassroots&#xd;
transitional justice mechanism and how its demand for use in transitional justice can&#xd;
be increased. The study was carried out using action research methodologies, with a&#xd;
mediation project carried out in the Makoni District of Manicaland in Zimbabwe. The&#xd;
mediation project involved community members addressing transitional-justice-related&#xd;
conflicts using mediation as a tool for conflict resolution. The mediators were provided&#xd;
with mediation skills through a training programme and their work was evaluated thrice&#xd;
to ascertain the role and impact of the mediation interventions on transitional-justicerelated conflicts. The project was termed Mediation for Everyday Transitional Justice&#xd;
because it was implemented in a natural community’s daily environment, by local&#xd;
people and for the local communities.&#xd;
The continuing failure of transitional justice mechanisms in Zimbabwe amid continued&#xd;
human rights violations justifies the undeniable value of this study. Zimbabwe’s past&#xd;
transitional justice efforts (since 1980, when the country became an independent&#xd;
republic) failed to build sustainable peace hence the country’s continued relapse into&#xd;
political and socio-economic turmoil. However, with appropriate transitional justice&#xd;
interventions that are built on grassroots-informed processes, sustainable peace is&#xd;
conceivable in Zimbabwe. Mediation, as an alternative dispute resolution process that&#xd;
is both persuasive and non-retributive, offers an interesting opportunity to the practice&#xd;
of transitional justice.&#xd;
The research concluded that the role of mediation in transitional justice is to facilitate&#xd;
truth telling, reparations, healing, and reconciliation among disputants without the&#xd;
need to use national-level transitional justice infrastructures. This means that, at the&#xd;
grassroots level, transitional justice processes can take place without waiting for the&#xd;
statist transitional justice approaches. However, in cases where the past human rights&#xd;
violations being addressed are tied to structural violence, driven from outside the&#xd;
community, local mediation processes may not be possible without the consent,&#xd;
cooperation, and willingness of those who sustain such conflicts. In addition, mediation&#xd;
cannot play any significant role in enabling prosecutorial justice, memorialisation, and&#xd;
institutional reforms at the grassroots level. Prosecutorial justice cannot be achieved&#xd;
because perpetrators can withdraw quickly when possibilities exist to be held&#xd;
criminally accountable for past human rights abuses. Institutional reforms also require&#xd;
changing governance policies and practices which are issues beyond the control of&#xd;
specific local communities. The study also observed that mediation is an effective tool&#xd;
for grassroots transitional justice issues because it is efficient, it saves time and&#xd;
financial resources, and it can be undertaken by local actors. To increase its demand&#xd;
and use in transitional justice processes at the grassroots level, these is a need to&#xd;
increase communities’ awareness of the importance of mediation in transitional justice,&#xd;
provide mediation-skills capacity-development interventions to potential mediators,&#xd;
and enhance the agency of various mediation actors at the grassroots levels.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>D</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2023-04-28T05:36:27Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2023-04-28T05:36:27Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4750</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4750</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>368 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>