<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T23:28:01Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4732" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4732</identifier><datestamp>2025-04-03T01:02:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_13</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_14</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Investigating the imperatives of research transformation at a University of Technology in South Africa</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Jinabhai, Chandrakala Daya</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Bodhanya, Shamim</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Research transformation</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Research productivity</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Research-led universities</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Research informed UoTs</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Systems thinking</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>System Dynamics</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Causal loop feedback</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Education, Higher--South Africa</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Research--South Africa</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Universities and colleges</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Educational change--South Africa</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Submitted in fulfillment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management Sciences: Leadership and Complexity, Durban University of Technology, Durban South Africa, 2022.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>This case study investigated the imperative of research transformation amongst&#xd;
academics at the selected Mangosuthu University of Technology (MUT) in South&#xd;
Africa, considering its low ranking of research output amongst 26 public higher&#xd;
education institutions (HEIs) by the South African Department of Higher Education and&#xd;
Training.&#xd;
The research problem for this case study was designed to investigate the main&#xd;
mitigating factors and barriers that inhibited academic careers of staff at this institution&#xd;
to transform to become productive researchers from a system dynamics perspective.&#xd;
Hence, the significance of this study was to address one of the three pillars of HEIs in&#xd;
terms of its research transformation and research productivity at this institution.&#xd;
Furthermore, this case study established how environmental dynamics holistically&#xd;
influenced academic staff to engage or not engage in research transformation. This&#xd;
was despite lucrative financial benefits offered, namely, research funding and study&#xd;
leave including other concrete incentives associated with research transformation.&#xd;
This was initiated for academic staff to inter alia, improving staff qualifications towards&#xd;
Master’s and Doctoral qualifications, conference presentations, technology transfer&#xd;
and knowledge production, and publications in accredited journals to produce the&#xd;
anticipated measured research output. Whilst there are a few prolific researchers&#xd;
within a few departments, it is alarmingly short in its endeavour towards attaining&#xd;
DHET research output goals and research transformation holistically at MUT.&#xd;
The aim of this study was to explore and develop an original system dynamics causal&#xd;
loop model with various components underscored by critical systems thinking and its&#xd;
impact of the holistic study per se. The research design for this study adopted a&#xd;
qualitative interpretative paradigm linked to system dynamics and the variables of the&#xd;
Causal Loop Diagram Model with an Interviewing Schedule. Thus, data was collected&#xd;
using a semi-structured interviewing schedule with open-ended questions in sync with&#xd;
a qualitative research design. Individual interviews were conducted with five academic&#xd;
staff members from each of the three faculties. Additionally, interviews with a focus&#xd;
group of six participants with similar interests were also included for the interviews.&#xd;
The key variables of the Causal Loop Model were tabulated and linked to research transformation from the participants at MUT. The data analysis collected from the&#xd;
interviews and policy documents were analysed under each of the research questions.&#xd;
Both participants’ reflections and institutional factors were also assimilated for the data&#xd;
analysis, vis-à-vis, research transformation at MUT.&#xd;
The findings revealed several individual and institutional factors contributing to low&#xd;
research transformation at this institution, namely, a small number of academic staff&#xd;
with PhDs, an uneven staff to student ratio, heavy workloads on teaching staff with&#xd;
limited time to engage in research productivity, unawareness of available incentives,&#xd;
lack of retention strategies of talented staff, poaching of academic staff, the&#xd;
interpretation of sabbatical leave and mentoring and supervision support initiatives.&#xd;
Furthermore, the study found several enablers aligned to research capacity building&#xd;
initiatives and critical factors to support a research culture at this institution. The main&#xd;
recommendations suggested were, inter-alia a buy-into research transformation by&#xd;
Executive Management and academic staff, improvement of vertical qualifications,&#xd;
supplementing academic support staff and tutors, employment of additional retired&#xd;
research professors, offering of structured mentoring and supervision assistance,&#xd;
specific training related to research productivity, review of the teaching workloads,&#xd;
implementation of sabbatical leave and retention policies. Finally, this case study has&#xd;
shown empirical evidence for further research opportunities related to research&#xd;
transformation in the higher education sector that could interface with the perceptions&#xd;
of research productivity and accelerate research outputs in peer reviewed accredited&#xd;
journals.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>D</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2023-04-26T06:40:47Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2023-04-26T06:40:47Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4732</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4732</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>371 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>