<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T03:20:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4544" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4544</identifier><datestamp>2025-04-03T01:04:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_7</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_8</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Foundation phase teacher professional learning outside the formal programmes and its influence on classroom practice in KwaZulu-Natal Province</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Makwara, Violet</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Mukeredzi, Tabitha</dc:contributor>
   <dc:contributor>Preece, Julia</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Foundation Phase (FP)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Teachers professional development</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Professional learning</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Early childhood education--Curricula</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Life skills--Study and teaching (Primary)--South Africa</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Literacy--Study and teaching</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Teachers--Training of</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Education, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2022.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>The Foundation Phase (FP) of schooling is a period when children’s learning readiness is&#xd;
uppermost, given that this is when they grow and thrive – physically, mentally, emotionally,&#xd;
spiritually, morally, and socially. The need to capitalise on this readiness thus becomes critical,&#xd;
as this is the period when conditions are most conducive to a strong foundation being laid, on&#xd;
which all later learning will rest.&#xd;
However, it has been documented that initial teacher education courses do not address the&#xd;
specifics of classroom/school realities to equip teachers to work optimally in the education&#xd;
sector (Mukeredzi and Samuel 2020; Nasimiyu 2017). Thus, job-embedded on-going&#xd;
professional learning for teachers, including FP teachers, which extends beyond teacher&#xd;
education is an indispensable aspect of the development and enhancement of teachers’&#xd;
professional knowledge, skills and practice, if meaningful teaching and learning is to take&#xd;
place.&#xd;
Compared to the large amounts of research in other education sectors, there is, and continues&#xd;
to be a dire need for research, and responsiveness to FP, apart from its contribution to children’s&#xd;
early learning. Thus, questions regarding how FP teachers professionally learn and develop&#xd;
beyond formal teacher preparation programmes have not been adequately answered. An&#xd;
understanding of these issues is crucial.&#xd;
This study explored FP teacher professional learning outside formal programmes, the kinds of&#xd;
professional knowledge that the teachers gain and how this learning influences their classroom&#xd;
practice. Through a multiple-site case study situated within an interpretive paradigm, subjective&#xd;
data were generated from 24 FP teachers employed at selected rural, township and urban&#xd;
schools in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, through focus group discussions, individual&#xd;
face-to-face interviews, and photo elicitation interviews. Manual data analysis adopted an&#xd;
eight-step coding process.&#xd;
Two theories: Biggs’ (2003) deep and surface learning theory and Illeris’ (2009) types of&#xd;
learning, complemented by domains of teacher knowledge by Shulman (1987) and Cogill&#xd;
(2008) enabled unpacking, understanding, and explaining study findings. These show that the&#xd;
FP teachers experienced professional learning through both deep and surface learning strategies&#xd;
in non-formal and informal interaction and collaboration, within two sites: restricted (the&#xd;
school) – through grade, phase and school meetings – and wider professional sites (outside the school) – through district, and cluster workshops and social meetings. The teachers experienced&#xd;
assimilative, and accommodative learning within the school, and cumulative learning in wider&#xd;
professional sites.&#xd;
Findings also revealed that FP teachers gained pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical content&#xd;
knowledge, knowledge of context, and knowledge of curriculum through their professional&#xd;
learning. The study found that professional learning influenced teachers’ classroom&#xd;
pedagogical practices around: teaching strategies, assessment, and classroom interaction.&#xd;
While the FP teachers experienced professional learning, under-resourcing in rural school&#xd;
contexts and a general lack of parental support in all the contexts studied, hampered teachers’&#xd;
learning. This implies a need for more schooling resources as well as support by parents.&#xd;
Professional learning can be supported. Given that some of the teachers work in under&#xd;
resourced and geographically rural contexts where they have ‘to make do’, this has a bearing&#xd;
on laying solid foundations for many children’s later learning within the wider context.&#xd;
In relation to the theoretical frameworks used in this study (deep and surface learning and types&#xd;
of learning), while these theories have been used in isolation to investigate university students’&#xd;
learning processes, this combination proved effective in studying teacher professional learning.&#xd;
What I found is that deep and surface learning strategies alone cannot adequately help&#xd;
understand teacher professional learning. I needed a theoretical way to understand, describe,&#xd;
and analyse data to establish the actual types of learning within the deep and surface realms.&#xd;
However, this thesis suggests a need for more comprehensive research into FP teacher&#xd;
professional learning outside the formal programmes drawing on this combined framework and&#xd;
developing it further to determine its applicability beyond the context of this particular inquiry.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>D</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2022-12-14T05:14:09Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2022-12-14T05:14:09Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2022-09</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4544</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4544</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>367 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>