<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T23:17:17Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4538" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/4538</identifier><datestamp>2025-04-03T01:06:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_11</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_12</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The impact of cryptococcal antigenaemia screening among patients attending King Dinuzulu Hospital</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Yohali, Missi Emilienne</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Mbatha, Joyce Nonhlanhla</dc:contributor>
   <dc:contributor>Niehaus, Abraham J.</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Impact</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Cryptococcal antigenaemia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Screening</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Cryptococcus neoformans</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Cryptococcus meningitis</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Cryptococcus neoformans--Patients</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Medical screening--South Africa--Durban</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>HIV-positive persons--Medical examinations--South Africa--Durban</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's degree in Medical Laboratory and Clinical Sciences at the Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2022.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Introduction&#xd;
The goal of this study was to give a general overview of Cryptococcus as a&#xd;
cryptococcosis causative agent. The morbidity, mortality and management of this&#xd;
type of infection are discussed, as well as the collaboration between the diagnostic&#xd;
laboratory service and the Department of Health.&#xd;
Aim&#xd;
The goal of this study was to see how cryptococcal antigenemia screening affected&#xd;
patient care at KDH.&#xd;
Objectives&#xd;
To determine whether screening for cryptococcus antigenemia leads to doctors&#xd;
necessary follow-up investigations. To report how often positive serum cryptococcal&#xd;
antigen screening results in cryptococcal meningitis treatment. To see if the current&#xd;
CD4 antigenemia threshold of less than 100 cells/µl is suitable for our patient&#xd;
population.&#xd;
Materials and Method&#xd;
This study took samples from patients at King Dinuzulu Hospital in Durban,&#xd;
eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The Laboratory Information System was&#xd;
utilized to diagnose cryptococcal infections in patients’ serum, plasma, and&#xd;
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as for normal patient management (Trakcare).&#xd;
Clinicians gathered specimens from patients as part of standard clinical care and&#xd;
forwarded them to the laboratory as data sources for this study. Cross-sectional,&#xd;
descriptive, and quantitative research were conducted on these specimens.&#xd;
Results&#xd;
The data that satisfied the inclusion criteria of the study were collected and analysed.&#xd;
Assay of 724 CSF and serum/plasma cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) results, including&#xd;
CSF culture results (n = 264) and CD4 counts (n = 446), were analysed for this&#xd;
section of the study. The bulk of CD4 counts, 433 (97.1%), were &lt; 100 cell/µl whereas&#xd;
13 (2.9%) were > 100 cells/µL. The number of patients with a CD4 count who stuck to their treatment was 22 out of 62. Eighty-five CrAg positive findings were obtained,&#xd;
with 62 receiving a CD4 count. There were 31 CrAg with a CD4 count of 0-49 cells/µL,&#xd;
28 with a CD4 count of 50-99 cells/µL, one with a CD4 count of 100-149 cells/µL, one&#xd;
with a CD4 count of 150-199 cells/µL, and one with a CD4 count of more than 200&#xd;
cells/µL. A higher percentage of patients had a follow up appointment. There was a&#xd;
higher proportion of patients who received a follow-up (10, 55.6%) than those who&#xd;
did not (3, 6.8%) p ˂ 0.001. Furthermore, those who started treatment within seven&#xd;
days had a higher proportion of patients without follow up (81.8 percent, n = 36) than&#xd;
those who had a follow up (0 percent, n = 0).&#xd;
Conclusion&#xd;
In conclusion, there was no positive benefit of CrAg screening on HIV-positive&#xd;
patients attending KDH, as stated in the study’s goal. In terms of the study’s goal and&#xd;
objectives, the findings revealed that the majority of positive CrAg samples were nt&#xd;
followed up on.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>M</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2022-12-05T14:19:12Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2022-12-05T14:19:12Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2022-09-29</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4538</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4538</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>92 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>