<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T08:47:36Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/2149" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:openscholar.dut.ac.za:10321/2149</identifier><datestamp>2025-03-07T22:45:15Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10321_11</setSpec><setSpec>col_10321_12</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>The relative effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy compared to Diclofenac sodium, in the management of mechanical low back pain</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Login, Jacqueline Iona</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Van der Meulen, Anthony G.</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Chiropractic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Backache</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Anti-inflammatory agents</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>A dissertation presented in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban, South Africa, 2001.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Hendler et al. (1995) describes low back pain as the most common, costly and  disabling musculosketetal condition. Giles (1997: 28) supports this, stating that  the annual incidence of low back pain in the adult population is between two and  five percent, with a lifetime prevalence of well over 50%.  For clinicians to choose the most appropriate therapy for managing this common  condition it is essential for research to be carried out to define the most effective  treatment. Shekelle (1994) explains that spinal manipulative therapy is an  effective treatment for patients with low back pain, while Cherkin et al. (1995)  states that there is strong evidence to support the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory  drugs in the management of mechanical low back pain. It is  therefore the purpose of this investigation to determine the relative effectiveness  of spinal manipulative therapy compared to Diclofenac Sodium, in terms of  subjective and objective measures, in the management of mechanical low back  pain.  This randomized controlled trial consisted of sixty patients between the ages of  18 and 65, complaining of mechanical low back pain. The sixty patients were  randomly divided into two treatment groups of thirty each. One group received  spinal manipulative therapy and the remaining thirty were administered  Diclofenac Sodium. These patients were carefully screened to allow the  researcher to diagnose the patient, with Lumbar Facet Syndrome, Sacroiliac  Syndrome or Myofascial Pain Syndrome; or any combination of these  syndromes. This is in accordance with Kirkaldy-Willis (1992: 105 - 119)  classification system. The thorough examination ensured that each patient had no contra-indications to spinal manipulative therapy or Diclofenac Sodium.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>M</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2017-01-31T06:49:25Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2017-01-31T06:49:25Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2001</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>121650</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2149</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2149</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>en</dc:language>
   <dc:format>168 p</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>